Agentic Research
Tool comparison

DifyvsLangGraph

A line-by-line comparison of positioning, difficulty, platforms, pricing and fit. Both entries state who they are not for — the crux of choosing is rarely which is stronger, but whose exclusion list misses your constraints.

Dify vs LangGraph
Dify
LangGenius
Intermediate
LangGraph
LangChain
Advanced
PositioningOpen-source LLMOps platform for visually orchestrating RAG and agent workflowsOrchestration library that describes agent flows as state graphs, supporting interrupts and resumption
DifficultyIntermediateAdvanced
PlatformsWeb · Self-hosted (Docker)Python · JavaScript
Pricing
Open sourcefree tier

Community edition is open source and self-hostable (free); cloud subscription and enterprise editions also exist. See the official page for current numbers.

see official siteOfficial
Open sourcefree tier

The library is open source and free; a hosted platform bills by usage — see the official site.

see official siteOfficial
Good for
  • Building maintainable RAG / agents without writing code
  • Enterprises needing private deployment
  • Centrally managing models, knowledge bases, and tools
  • Controllable, interruptible, resumable agent flows
  • Human-in-the-loop designs
  • Orchestrating complex branching and loops
Not for
  • One-off scripts (plain code is faster)
  • Highly complex multi-agent coordination (use a dedicated framework)
  • Non-technical business staff
  • Simple linear automations
Junze editorial rating
Dify
Capability
44/5
Ease of use
44/5
Cost value
55/5
Privacy control
55/5
LangGraph
Capability
55/5
Ease of use
22/5
Cost value
44/5
Privacy control
44/5

Amounts appear only after we verify them manually; otherwise defer to the official site.

Keep comparing

Other comparisons for Dify
Other comparisons for LangGraph