Agentic Research
中文
Tool comparison

Beautiful.aivsGamma

A line-by-line comparison of positioning, difficulty, platforms, pricing and fit. Both entries state who they are not for — the crux of choosing is rarely which is stronger, but whose exclusion list misses your constraints.

Beautiful.ai vs Gamma
Beautiful.ai
Beautiful.ai
Beginner
Gamma
Gamma Tech
Beginner
PositioningPresentation tool constrained by design rules, with AI handling content and layoutOne click from outline or document to web-based presentation-ready slides
DifficultyBeginnerBeginner
PlatformsWebWeb
Pricing
Subscriptionno free tier

Subscription with individual and team plans; see the official site.

see official siteOfficial
Freemiumfree tier

Free tier with limited quota; Plus / Pro plans unlock more output and remove watermarks. See the official page for current numbers.

see official siteOfficial
Good for
  • Producing visually consistent decks fast
  • Not wanting to do layout yourself
  • Teams needing unified templates
  • You already have a text outline and need slides fast
  • No templates, no manual layout
  • Turning a long document into presentable slides
Not for
  • Heavily customised brand design
  • Deeply editable native file output
  • Strict corporate brand styling (fine control is limited)
  • Needing a deeply editable native .pptx
Junze editorial rating
Beautiful.ai
Capability
33/5
Ease of use
55/5
Cost value
33/5
Privacy control
22/5
Gamma
Capability
44/5
Ease of use
55/5
Cost value
44/5
Privacy control
22/5

Amounts appear only after we verify them manually; otherwise defer to the official site.

Beautiful.ai · Tool detailGamma · Tool detail

Keep comparing

Other comparisons for Beautiful.ai
Other comparisons for Gamma
Full review of Beautiful.ai· Decks & DocumentsFull review of Gamma· Decks & DocumentsBack to tool library